Showing posts with label news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news. Show all posts

Sunday, 11 May 2014

Human Rights news: We Need to Show Compassion Toward Immigrant Children

First philosophical question: Is this is a task? Is this a news? No, it's NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA BAAAATMAAAAAAAN.

Talking about completely absurd humour:

It's a pretty cool song, actually

And now, as for the post:

You said it, you get it
The link: Hello! My name is Link. I save sages and a princess. I have a Master Sword.

The news in 50 words:

The writer tells us about her shocking experiences interviewing immigrant mothers, emphasising on the case of a Sri Lankan refugee whose children were brought to the Bangkok Immigration Detention Center once they were discovered in their tiny apartment in Thailand's capital city, remarking the bitter irony of today's Mother's Day.


In order to answer the other questions, I'd like to refer to another piece of news I've found (click here)

As Africans Surge to Europe’s Door, Spain Locks Down

MELILLA, Spain — It is easy to pick out the new arrivals at the shelter for immigrants here on this tiny patch of Spain in North Africa. One man limps by on crutches with a plaster cast on his ankle. Another has a bandaged arm in a sling. Abbdol Cisse, 19, had stitches on his face.
“The police in Morocco were throwing stones at us, at our heads,” Mr. Cisse said recently, explaining his injuries. “They had metal bars, and they hit our legs while we were climbing.”
Ten years ago Spain spent more than 30 million euros building up the barriers around Melilla and Ceuta, its two enclaves surrounded by Morocco on the northern coast of Africa, which offer the only land borders between the promise of Europe and the despair of Africa. And for a while the investment seemed to work.
But in the past year, large groups of sub-Saharan immigrants have been charging the rows of seven-yard-high chain-link fences here with increasing frequency, or trying to swim around them, believing with good reason that if they can just get past they will ultimately end up in Europe. They often end up injured, not just from falls and the newly laid concertina wire, but at the hands of the Moroccan and Spanish authorities trying to stop them.

It's not specifically about immigrant children, but no one should be treated like this, neither children nor adults. As you can see, our own country's police does terrible things to immigrants on the very African continent. Especially in the United States, Latino immigrants that arrive on boats are dealt with quite strictly.
Since this a problem that "only" affects certain areas of a country (basically the borders) and it's about the actions of the police of our own country (who act by law, as it seems), the only possibility I see to provoke a change is through campaigning from the inside of our own country, from the very citizens that were born here. This way, the government should realise that it's actually an issue that concerns everyone, not only the ones who receive the violence. 
Of course immigration has to be regulated in some way, but instead of preventing illegal movements using brute force, there should be institutions to negotiate (in a human way, not like the Bangkok Detention Center by separating children and mother) between the different countries who are stable enough to welcome immigrants and give them the a chance of a new life in better conditions than they had earlier. In my opinion, it's the responsibility of the richer countries to enable immigration, especially for refugees and alike, since it's a way to weaken the influence of the political forces that pressured them to escape. At least I think that's a better solution than sending the own military troops and blow up even more innocent civilists.

News: Could flight restrictions on liquids be lifted?

Yes, please.

Oh, and thanks for video news. This is so comfortable: Why read when you can watch?


So, as the video explains they're going to use a new scanning device in airports that can analyse the content of bottles without opening them. Thus, it's possible that they'll finally lift the restrictions on liquids for flights. They've just started a trial period in 65 airports. Let's hope it receives positive feedback so we can avoid dumb arguments about plastic bags and 100 ml bottles on our upcoming flying trips. And maybe someday they'll accept handcuffs as well. Just saying.

I kind of do understand why they are this strict with liquids in our hand baggage. Around two weeks ago I participated in a little science fair in Girona (we literally had a homemade cloud chamber, one type of particle detector; I might explain that next term in the bl- wait...). There was one teacher from one the schools or universities around who made some simple physics and chemistry experiments and demonstrations. One of them was pretty... impressive.

He took one of those sticks that teachers used before as pointers for the blackboard in class. Then he told us that one day, when he still had one of them, his students were talking all the time. He told them to be quiet, but they wouldn't shut their mouths. He kept warning them, without success, until he finally said: "And then I let the pointer drop just like this" And while he was explaining he let the pointer drop just on its pointing end and then we heard a KABOOOOOOM. And I even saw the little explosion. I saw the fire. It was hilarious. Afterwards he revealed that he had put a very tiny quantity of a liquid explosive on the pointer. And precisely because it's that easy to do, they're so untolerant about liquids on flights.

Nonetheless, why only 100 ml and why a plastic bag? How does that help? If such a minuscule amount is already enough, shouldn't they prohibit liquids completely? Not that I want to convince of this idea... I guess there's a reasonable explanation for this. At least I hope.

However, you know how this scanning device works that they're trying to use now?
You don't?

Particle physics ;P

Well, at least I suppose.
Because I know that they use particles to determine the authentity of old wine so they don't have to open the bottle, which would make it lose its value. And this is practically the same application.

Now come and tell me particle physics isn't good for anything, tehehe.


Oh, the video also features another report about a tourist attraction in Shanghai which consists of a house that's turned upside down, which you can enter. 
Suprisingly enough, this is a copy of another house like that in Germany. China... One of my friends even saw one of these houses (didn't go inside though, too expensive). I must be fair, they're more copies of that attraction in other places in Germany as well.


No new words this time, sorry. Tehehe.

Saturday, 10 May 2014

News: Nintendo apologizes for games' same-sex slight

I read that the other day on one of my games news websites, but I just found this on CNN (as it seems it's become a big thing) and I thought I should comment on that one. DON'T WORRY, THIS POST IS NOT SPECIFICALLY ABOUT GAMES DESPITE THE TITLE.


I'll sum this up quickly to proceed to my own thoughts. Basically, Nintendo, a video game company as you all probably know, released a certain game some months ago which was called "Tomodachi Life". It is a life simulator, in a similar manner like The Sims. However, many fans complained that it was not possible to have homosexual relationships in the game although the game focuses (among other things) on relationships, creating families, etc. while other games like The Sims feature this option. It is arguable if the lack of gay and lesbian relationships was the result of the company's stance regarding the topic or if its just fruit of the difference of the status of the polemic topic in the different cultures (note that equality and rights for homosexuals has been an important topic in the Western world lately).
Now that it's been confirmed that the game will get released in Europe and the United States as well, Nintendo decided to publish an official apologise. They explain that they can't change this feature without reprogramming almost the whole game, but that they pledge to consider the players' wishes for future games and that they strive to design products that enable all players to be represented better.

From here on, my own opinion:

Ok, so far so good. Now, be honest. Having read this introduction, do you think there's any reason for anyone to be furious? Anyone? Even the homosexual fraction that was upset about the missing feature wasn't, in fact, THAT upset.

"The situation wouldn't be as big of a deal if it weren't for the fact that relationships and marriage are a huge part of the game," Marini said
"[...] Not being able to date and marry the gender that I'm attracted to in real life really takes all of the immersion and fun out of it for me."
Marini has specifically said he's not calling for a boycott of the game, saying it would do more harm than good.
What I can see here is a protest, but as mentioned above, nobody is trying to boycott the game nor Nintendo. And that's absolutely OK. But then you see comments like this:

By the user
I'm still upset that Nintendo isn't letting Mario and Luigi have an incestuous homosexual relationship in the Mario games... I mean really Until they change that I think everyone who has a loving relationship with their brother should stop buying all mario games!!! Seriously though Articles like this want to attack nintendo but seem to not care that Nintendo has right as well and are sticking to "THEIR" morals. Should everyone give up on what they believe because someone else believes something else? If so maybe we should start having goat sacrifices instead of paying taxes? .. No, articles like tese are just attacking a company that is standing their ground for what they believe in. If someone doesn't like the game the way it is intended to be made.. you don't have to play it, or you can make your own. I hear Nintendo is willing to work with Indie developers. Heck Conception 2 on both the Vita and 3DS lets you make babies with guys.
At least someone hit the point; b:
Equating homosexuality to incest is the trademark of the uneducated fundie.
Another "great" comment:
Based on this article and the actions of most homosexuals, i've come to the conclusion that they're the ones who are uneducated. Wanting to change everything under the sun to fit them? What's next a gay superman, a gay batman, a gay ralph cramden? Don't be stupid. If a company wants to create a game their way, you don't have to buy it or play it. It's a game not a law.

I only want to judge this particular case. And in this particular case, homosexuals complained about a game that consciously thematises relationships as a main element of the game. I believe that it's only fair to include both hetero- and homosexual couples. A part from taking away the possible immersion and identification for players that are actually gay or lesbian themselves, it's also just a missing feature for any player who would like to create a homosexual character in their game. Because, in my eyes, a tolerant player is completely indifferent about the feature and should even welcome it because after all, it's just one more possibility of playing the game. And that is good. If you play a football game, isn't it just good if there are more football teams available even if not everybody wants to use them? (As long as this doesn't obstruct other aspects of the game, for example by straining the games' memory capacity).
Nintendo apologised for not having done that from the very beginning, promises to care about it in the next titles and there the story should reach its end.

But then the media comes and I read news titles like this one in the BBC:

Nintendo says 'No' to gay game characters

Who on Earth said 'No' to anything? They said that they couldn't patch the game afterwards. That's all. I firmly believe that all the arguments about 'gay people trying to change everything under the sun to fit them' are plainly ignorant. 

We're talking about a particular case where relationships are the central element of the game. Isn't it a natural choice to include different possibilites of relationships?

I mean, I am not interested in these kinds of games and even if I was, I would buy the game either way, with or without homosexual couples in it, since it doesn't concern me personally.

What I actually do find worrying are the reactions, mostly coming from the people against the implementation of gay/lesbian relationships. The majority of them seems to apply their general disagreement regarding the fight for equalism of homosexual people and don't even think for a single instant about the validity of their statements in this particular case. 

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is exactly as "extremist" as the actions of gay/lesbian extremists (whom I don't support either, of course). It's exactly this attitude that prevents us from progressing (compare that to the way the Spanish government is handling abortion).



If anybody has the time and is interested in the topic, I invite you to comment on this post and tell me your opinion about this story (I'm pretty sure I'll receive like ln(1) comments) 

mathjokesftw


New words I've learnt:

Saturday, 1 March 2014

News: "How Sports Illustrated shot Kate Upton in a bikini and zero gravity"

For the last news post, I thought I should do something special. And when I say special... You know me, expect something REALLY special to come ;D

This term I've focused a lot on games in my yoursays and my news posts were all about scientific topics, except the Whatsapp-Facebook dilem fusion. These science news featured different topics, a lot about astronomy and the origin of our Earth and the last one covered a little neuroscience.
Sadly though, some people don't appreciate the advantatges science grants us. The last news item is dedicated to those people, mostly the male fraction. I'm sure you will find two convincing arguments that science is amazing in this post.



I don't know if you usually read the original news articles or only my post ... Or only the news article (I hope not), but this time I liked the writing of the journalist a lot, so it's worth clicking right HERE! (or any other point of this unnecessarily long hyperlink)

I'm really sorry, girls. I think I'm making you suffer a lot this time.


So, a fashion magazine called Sports' Illustrated publishes a special issue on an annual basis: the swimsuit issue. (Hmmm.. I'm sounding as if I were an expert on that stuff... I don't like that. I'm only using information from the news article, really!)
This time they decided to do something special as well (probably there's a crazy German working for them). I don't know about you, but I can't quite imagine that brainstorming session:

Boss: "Alright guys, we need a special feature for this years' swimsuit issue. Any ideas?"
Assumedly crazy German: "Zero G?"
Boss: "BRILLIANT!"

Zero G refers to the sensation of zero gravity, as if you didn't weigh at all. The Zero Gravity Corporation from the United States organises special flights where people can experience the feeling of zero G thanks to the parabolic trajectory of the aircraft:


Usually, one of those flights includes 15 parabolas. 12 simulate weightlessness (0G), 2 make you feel as if you were on the moon (G/6, a sixth of the Earth's gravity) and 1 that lets you prepare for your one-way trip to the Mars (G/3, a third part of Earth's gravity).
Each state of reduced gravity lasts for approximately 30 seconds.

What about wind tunnels now, huh? Not that great anymore, right? (yeah, I haven't tried them out by myself yet...)

If you're considering to go on one of these flights... Bear in mind that around two out of every three participants.. Well. They can greet their breakfast from that morning once again. And that's the reason why these flights are also known as "vomit comets".

Please imagine that situation ocurring in zero gravity. Majestic.

And there's another thing to remember, please have a look at the parabola diagram once again. Note the indication before and after reaching zero gravity: 1.8g.
That means that, after flailing around like an idiot (although a happy idiot, I admit), you are accelerated against the interior walls of the plane with almost two times Earth's gravity. In other words, if you weigh 70 kilograms, you are pushed against the wall in a free fall as if you almost weighed 140 kilograms. So it would be better that either you or the walls were padded. In this case, both the walls and the model were well padded. If you know wha Bah, retoric questions aside, you know perfectly what I mean. There's a comment on the article related to this that I liked a lot:

Kate Upton smashing into the floor of the plane with 2gs...  terrible, had I been there I would have volunteered to stay under her and break her fall


Sorry for appearingly destroying your dreams of zero gravity flights in such a draconian manner. In fact, that's not correct. If a supermodel can smile into a camera while experiencing zero G, you would withstand it as well, I'm sure.





And now with all seriousness, my opinion about the beauty industry, models, etc. actually coincides with the article writer's. BUT. At least more people got to hear about the possibility of zero G flights, a cool product of science. And that's a positive point. Additionally, I do respect the model's capability of posing in front of the camera with these circumstances. I don't even look good in photos with normal gravity.


This time I've got the feeling I can make a good use of the new vocabulary I've learnt:
padded
flail
draconian

News: "Emoticon language is 'shaping the brain'"

:) :( :D :O :P >:D :$ Ö ^^ <(^_^)< <(^-^)> >(^_^)> °-° *.* -.- -____- <3 :| :3 ;X XD xd 

I was just shaping your brain. I'm that badass. 


A doctor from a school of psychology was receiving emails from his students where they used to include emoticons like the combination of a colon, a hyphen and a right parenthesis ":-)"and that led him to further thoughts: do we recognise emoticons the same way we identify real faces?
According to prior studies in neurosciences, when we perceive a person's face, we distinguish the relative position of the mouth to the nose and the eyes, which activates certain parts of our brain. Once the face is inverted our brain is also stimulated, although in a different manner.
So they decided to conduct an experiment to analyse the brain activities when people observe emoticons. 20 participants were shown real faces, emoticons and then meaningless strings of characters.
The interesting result: Other than it happens with real faces, there are no face-related stimuli when emoticons are stripped of their usual order, that is to say, when they inverted the traditional configuration ":-)" to "(-:" many participants' brains didn't recognise it as a face (even though I'm pretty sure they were aware that it was supposed to be a face by logical reasoning, but it is a fact that their brain didn't receive the same stimulations).
So, what does that mean? Well, since our brains only identify the emoticons directly as faces in the traditional order, we can conclude that emoticons have become a linguistic code on their own which we only read when they're used in the proper configuration. You could compare this to normal words. If I write "glob s'namreG yzarc A" you probably don't get the meaning at the very first sight. Soon you understand that you're supposed to read the line from the right to the left, you convert the code into our linguistic agreement, putting the letters in the correct order (mentally) and then you identify the message. But that's just what applies to our culture, note that Arabian languages are read from right to left. In other words, cultural influences go very deep, they even have their effects on our brains. I even remember myself having read a comment on a website which featured a "D:" and I didn't understand at first sight that it was supposed to be a negative version of the classic ":D".
All in all, I think it's a nice fun-fact, though nothing groundbreaking. Also, the news article did not specify the ages of the participants. Emoticons started appearing in the 1980's and have become especially famous thanks to the Internet. So I think it's reasonable to consider separating that experiment into different age groups. The effects that emoticons have on people of my generation who have grown up with the Internet might be different than the ones on those who have experienced the revolution of the Internet from the very beginning or the ones who lived this revolution at an advanced age.

Finally, I'd like to spread a message of optimism: Be happy, guys. There's always a reason to be happy. :)

Oh, the vocabulary... Damn, that was such a nice conclusion -.-



PS: This was post number 100! Wow, that's a lot... A shame that I won't be able to make the over 9000 joke...

Friday, 28 February 2014

Olds: "200,000 people apply to live on Mars"

This news item is so two thousand and late. Well, actually it's from December last year. When I was reading the previous article on that crystal, this one showed up and I remembered how stunned I had felt last year hearing about these crazy people.


A Dutch company will organise a trip for 4 people to planet Mars. A one-way trip. 

The technology for a return flight doesn't exist -- there's no Kennedy Space Center launch pad over there! -- and having a one-way trip greatly reduces costs, the company has said.
It greatly reduces costs, there you have it. 

A previous unmanned Mars mission is slated for 2018. This way, the company in charge wants to demonstrate the possibility of living on Mars. One of the experiments they will conduct to assure that condition will be, for example, the synthesis of liquid water on Mars, obviously an indispensable requirement for humans to survive. If everything goes right with the experiments and they manage to fund the project, 2025 is a ballpark estimation for the date of the actual trip. The way they plan to resolve the financial aspect is quite interesting, though. They will hold some kind of Big Brother show, a live stream from Mars, so we can know if Britney did weird things with an alien during night and that kind of stuff. The objective is to send more new people to the lander every two years. That is a good idea, I think, because hanging around the rest of your life with the same 3 people you didn't choose initially as your friends, no, you're rather forced to live by their side. AND THAT ON MARS. On the other side... If you're volunteering for going to Mars for the rest of your life... I guess there must be a very few things that you actually fear o can't adapt to.
And that's the point that I wanted to reach... Who are those 200,000 people that want to go to Mars for the rest of their life? I saw a report on TV when the news was still, well, "new" and I can tell you: all kinds of people. Some of them are quite young and they're just looking for a literally pioneering adventure, others are older ones or people suffering from certain diseases that reduce their life expectancy and they simply want to make something special of the last years they still have. And honestly - whatever your reasons you have to be like REALLY crazy to subscribe on that mission - I do respect those people. A lot. Because I would never be able to leave my life on Earth behind... forever. 
In addition to that, I think this mission provides a huge leeway for learning more about Mars. The rest of your life is probably enough time to do a lot of stuff up there. If they really end up mounting the journey, which I hope, I will be one of the enthusiastic followers of the stream and the data we'll receive from there.
So... As you can see, I seem to be a lot into spacy things lately. Spacy as in space, not as in Kevin Spacey... Ugh, I mean, he's a good actor and everything but... ugh.
Back to the topic... I'm beginning to consider seriously if I would like to travel out to space one day... That would be one major goal to achieve... And definitely not an easy one.
But don't worry, I know you'd miss me, so I wouldn't go one-way ;3



I was looking for pictures related to "Mars"... That's the best I could find

And, eventually, the highlight of every news post, the reason you're reading my blog, what am I saying, THE REASON WHY'RE YOU'RE ALIVE: the vocabulary.

Thursday, 27 February 2014

News: "4.4 billion-year-old crystal is oldest piece of Earth"


I always say that I won't complain about my age once I get older. Basically because I'm annoyed by people that, at their late or even mid-twenties, keep saying that they're already old... If it makes you feel better, you haven't even lived a billionth of the time that the Earth already exists. I'm sure that fact is a great help. Sure.

Click here to buy your own 4.4 billion-year-old crystal!

The Earth is believed to be about 4.5 billion years old, or more accurately, at least 4.5 billion years old. So that crystal is quite close, huh? How do scientists know about the minimum age of our planet, though? It's as simple as that: they discovered rocks that could be proven to be at least that old. And once again: how do they tease out that kind of information?
The standard process geologists apply is analising the amount of specific uranium isotopes. You probably know uranium because of their use in nuclear reactors in power plants. An isotope is nothing but one possible "type" of a specific element, in that case uranium. An element is defined by the number of protons its atoms contain, but the number of neutrons is variable. Depending on the number of neutrons we talk about different isotopes, for example U-235 or U-238, "U" being the symbol of uranium. Some isotopes are unstable and decay. That is what we know by radioactivity. And now there comes the clue: every isotope has a characteristic life span, scientists refer to this with the concept of "half life". The function that describes the amount of decayed isotopes over time isn't linear but has a curvy form. The half life of a certain isotope is defined as the time it takes for exactly 50% of the quantity of that isotope in question to decay. In other words, let's say the half life of U-235 was a year. If you have 10 grams of U-235, in one year, there would be only 5 grams left, which means a loss of 5 grams. Once another year will have passed, the leftovers would weigh 2.5 grams, a loss of 2.5 grams. Three years from now you'd have 1.25 grams and so on. As you can see, the amount of U-235 you lose isn't a constant number. It's always the half of your previous weight of isotopes, thus not linear. By doing several calculations, we can determine the age of a rock by analysing the amount of an isotope it still contains, implying its half life.
The technique that allowed them to find out the age of this particular crystal, an atom-probe tomograhpy, was a little more complex since it also considers the possible migration of the studied element, in that case lead instead of uranium. Nonetheless, the basic idea is the same. Curious enough is the fact that the biggest dimension between the crystal pieces they discovered was only 400 micrometers in length, which equals 0.4 millimeters. That is just a tad larger than a house dust mite or more a less 4 human hairs.
Finally, I think it's quite interesting to point out that most rocks that were studied in processes like the one I explained earlier aren't even from Earth, which is why the title reads "oldest piece of Earth" (the crystal the article talks about was actually a part of the Earth). According to this website, the "best" prove we have of the minimum age of the Earth was deduced by measuring the lead ratio in iron meteorites. Also, moon rocks have been a great help, too. By the way, did you know that the moon was in fact a part of the Earth? One day, more or less at the very "earliest time" we know for sure the Earth already existed (the 4.5 billion years I mentioned at the beginning of this post), a meteorite with a similar size like Mars crashed into the Earth. The impact projected huge pieces of the Earth a long distance away from the planet's center. Gravitional force was responsible for those pieces to concentrate, until finally shaping the moon as we know it today. I wonder if all moons of every planet in our solar system have been "born" like this. I should do some research.

Talking about "the elder ones"

Don't expect me to write a funny sentence to introduce you the new words. I said I'm busy doing research!

tad
tease out
mite

News: "Facebook to buy messaging app WhatsApp for $19bn"

I must admit that there were actually no new words for me in this piece of news and yeah, I agree that it would be ridiculous to pretend there were some by putting basic vocabulary on here...


Having said that, please, proceed quickly. Facebook might buy my blog before you finish reading this post. And if Facebook buys it, it can only get worse. #antihipstermainstreampositioning #instairony


Well, I guess everyone has already heard about that. Facebook bought Whatsapp for... peanuts, just some 19 billion US dollars... That was probably Mark Zuckerberg's toilet paper.

One of the WhatsApp co-founders will work together with Facebook and apperently they are quite excited about their upcoming cooperation.

I don't know. Personally, I've never been a big fan of Facebook. Actually, I'm not really into social media at all. Don't get me wrong, I think the technological advances in the field of communication are amazing and the possibilities they grant us are extremely valuable and deserve respect. But. People overdo things. People get too excited about things. People put more life into social media than into their lives. And what's worst: social pressure urges you to do the same. 
For example, I've noticed that, sometimes, I'm not in the mood to talk to people on WhatsApp but even though I answer. The thing is, once I connect into the app, I have to answer all the messages because if not, people begin to have existential crisis: they think I ignore them, that I don't recognise them as people anymore or whatever. And you know what? When somebody has gone online without responding me, I REACT EXACTLY THE SAME. And it scares me because I perfectly know it's absurd. But I just can't help feeling that way. It's creepy. I don't like it.
Then Facebook... I mean, it's basic function is to inform and get informed about anything people you're supposed to know do, right? Well, I don't care for 99,999999999% of the rubbish these people post on Facebook. Of course I do have an interest to hear about my close friends' experiencies and how they feel about it and blablabla. But do I need/want to hear that stuff from EVERYONE IN MY SCHOOL? Definitely not. Then some smartasses come along and say that they don't care for those people either. And then you have a look at their profiles and see that they've got 1046 friends. By the mercy of God, what is the point of it? You invest time in something you're not even really interested in.

WhatsApp at least is quite functional since it allows you to talk easily to people and that's all. No additional decoration or futile extras. Although I believe that many users rely too much on WhatsApp without realising. To them, WhatsApp is the first way of communication BEFORE face-to-face talking...
And now Facebook comes around the corner and, after doing the same with Instagram, they go and buy WhatsApp. Because why not. I don't really see how a collaboration between Facebook and WhatsApp can give birth to any good new features. The worst case scenario would be a link between your FB and your WA account. Because if that happened, WhatsApp would be dead as we know it currently and as I relatively appreciate it right now.
Did you know Facebook also wanted to buy Snapchat?

At least HE should be happy, I guess...


News: "NASA discovers 715 new planets"

They didn't just kill two birds with one stone, no no no... They freaking discovered 715 new planets with one single space observatory! These NASA guys, never disappointing ;)


In 2009, NASA launched the Kepler space observatory with the specific objective to find planets similar to the Earth, that is to say, planets that are located in a habitable zone. In this context, a habitable zone refers to a planet that is at the right distance from its sun, the central star of its galaxy, so that the temperature conditions on the planet enable the existence of liquid water, the basic substance for life, as we know it on Earth, to subsist.
Until recently, we had accumulated data about approximately 1000 planets altogether. This Wednesday NASA announced the discovery of seven hundred fifteen new planets. At once. Quite a lucky day I guess, hitting the jackpot, finding the intergalactical mother lode.
4 of the planets among that long list are possible candidates for hosting life. All of them have a similar size, more or less twice the Earth's size. This is no coincidence, though. NASA tried a new way of planet researching using the technique of verification by multiplicity which, as we know now, opened the bottleneck. Basically that means two things. First, they took advantage of the laws of probability by focusing on stars that are likely to have a higher number of planets travelling around them in their respective orbits. So, more planets equals a better chance of finding a planet of interest. Second, once they found a planet that verified the desired conditions, they used the data to reveal other planets that are alike. Initially the technique is biased on planets close to the star in the center of the galaxy in question, afterwards it "opens its mind" to other planets orbiting with bigger radii (well, to be accurate, the orbits are elliptic and not perfect circles and thus, technically, I shouldn't use the word "radius"... But anyway, you know what I mean).
I must say that I do believe that life exists at another place in the universe besides from the Earth. The universe is just too big and I think it's absurd that intelligent life, able to comprehend the nature that originated it, has only formed at one exclusive place. Just imagine a III World War takes place and the human race extinguishes itself. Then what? It's like that example of the tree that falls in a solitary forest. If there's no one in the wood, does the tree make noise falling? No, because there's no one hearing it. The only thing the tree does is causing vibrations in the air that originate what we call soundwaves, merely a physical process. So if the universe keeps expanding, physical processes keep ocurring but there's no intelligent life to reflect about it anymore... Then what's the point? Wouldn't it be completely senseless?
Oh and I think I'm starting to fancy a trip to the moon. Or another celestial body if science will have progressed enough until I'm ready to do it, which I highly doubt. I don't know, just imagine being out there, in the space... Looking at your home planet from such a long distance. I'm sure it completely changes your conception of life. One day guys, either I become an astronaut or insolently rich, it's really that easy.

g/6

Aliens taught me 3 new words. Quick, have a look at the definition (now the English definition and not just the egoistic German traduction!!!) before the Men in Black come and erase my memory!

Saturday, 30 November 2013

News: "Computer display that lets you touch the real world"


Okay, I overdid things with my last news post... in more than one aspect. So, let's finish the news collection with an ordinary post. Because ordinary posts are the extraordinary ones in my blog.

So, to understand what this is all about, you need to see it by yourself first. It won't make any sense otherwise. I'll give you a moment to check the link above if you haven't done so yet.

...

Alright, so as you've just seen, technologies already allow us to do some really crazy stuff. They call this invention the inFORM Dynamic Shape Display and it uses 3D pixels to recreate the movements of your hands recorded by a camera at your place. You have that special display lying on a tabletop and suddenly these tower-like objects start raising and descending. If that wasn't still enough of a psychedelic experience for video-calls you can even set some projectors on your ceilings that project beams which give the 3D pixels different hues. The creators insist that they internally prefer to call them 2.5 pixels though, because right now they can be only be moved vertically, not horizontally. The quick up/down motion simulates a 3D effect. 
But anyway, just imagine the possibilities that little toy offers us! I mean, someday maybe you could play board games while talking about your date last night to your best friend who sits on his sofa on the other side of the world. That's not too far from the demonstration in the video, the tiny ball that you can handle like if you were actually touching it.
The only thing that makes me worry are these dating sites in the web... Just imagine a dirty mind getting his filthy hands on that device. It gives me a chill. Well, at least for now people will have to rely on the classic cybersex:





And imagine this: I've learnt new words thanks to this nice article! I know, unbelievable, right? Here they are:






And that's it, I'm done! It's Friday night or Saturday morning, depending on your point of view, I'm terribly tired but I'm happy I got rid of one my burdens. Anyway, among all the burdens, the blog is definitely one that needs lots of time and dedication, but it's also one of the most refreshing school activities. And I hope that I can at least make your day a little better by all that... That... salad of freakishness.
I already have some ideas for my next yoursays so stay tuned for round number 2 ;)
But as for now, see you next year!

Friday, 29 November 2013

Breaking News: +++ Severe constipation kills 41-year-old elephant at Miami zoo +++


"Good evening and welcome to the Fox News. As journalists, the motto for our news is: 'Fair & Balanced'. That's why we have the flag of the United States of America in the background of our logo.

Our news are so transparent, you can even literally see our nationalistic tendency
Today we have a very important announcement to share. The current President of Russia, Vladimir Putin, has declared war to Germany. The catalyst for the quick escalation seems to be the post of an anonymous young blond underaged in his web blog titled "A Crazy German's Blog" including a satirical image of Putin: Link to said blog post. Certain sources have confirmed that Putin reads every morning, after having two fried eggs and a shot of vodka for breakfast, the new posts of his favourite web blog: A Crazy German's Blog. But today, while pursuing his daily activities, Putin has been forced to face direct criticism. Two nuclear bombs have been dropped in Berlin and Cologne by the Russian air force, called by Putin 'warning shots'. He claims that-
One moment please, we are getting new information. Oh my god, really? That cannot be true... It is? Oh dear... *Ehem* I beg your pardon, I was just too shocked by this novelty.
The situation has dramatically changed. We have received breaking news from Miami that overshadow the previous announcements. An official from a popular zoo has confirmed the death of Maude, an Asian elefant, at the age of 41 years.


Please click on the play button to hear the song playing in the background from now on. Continue reading as you listen to the song.



As a result of the necropsy, the forensics department of the Miami Dade Police states severe constipation as the alleged cause of death. The zoo's communications director, Ron Magill, is shocked:
'I cannot believe our beloved Maude is gone. It was so surprising. Now that I think about it, he was actually behaving strangely last week. He stopped eating and consequently he had no bowel movements anymore. But I think it was just love. You have to know, Maude was brought to our zoo to be the companion of one of our female elephants. They matched perfectly. It's so tragic that their love wasn't meant to last long. But I guess the best love stories aren't meant to go on for a long time... Obviously, I matched Maude's odd behavior and his strong feelings. Here is an image I took during one of our examination sessions:

Elephants don't have butterflies in their stomach but on their ears
The people from the forensics told me that Maude's suspicious conduct was probably a product of a heavy constipation. But I know that Maude died from heart problems. And I don't mean a heart stroke or something like that, no. His heart was broken. 10 days ago I witnessed a critical situation and I think Maude got wind of it. His mistress was found to be having intimate contact with Will, one of our Afroamerican elephants:' (by clicking on the Show/Hide button you confirm that you're over 18 years old and you accept the Terms of Use of this news report)

Magill continues:

'I can perfectly imagine how Maude must have felt:

"What does an Afroamerican have that an Asian like me doesn't? What's the huge difference between us? What is it that fills the gap between my darling and me?"

Poor Maude. I think he deserves a minute of silence.'


Our holy saviour, Mr. President Sir Barack Obama has already given an official statement declaring today's date, the 29th of November, as the new International Day of the Elephant.

We are getting more information...

As a reaction to the sudden death of Maude, Putin has just called a truce as a tribute to our beloved Maude, promising not to release his nuclear rockets until past 12PM.

Please stay tuned for further reports about the appalling event in Miami."




PS: I'd like to spotlight the following points:

1. If you're shattered by this post and you're about to report my blog due to sexual content, I should point to the fact that this is part of the stress therapy my psychologist recommended.

2. Please type "Fox News" into the Google Image Search. I didn't know that Americans can be that satirical as well.

3. Three words or terms I've learned thanks to this superimportant news:

bowel movement
alleged (found in other news titles... there was no third unknown word in the mentioned item of news)

4. The proof that this piece of news was superimportant:

Actually it was on the first position, that must be an error due to a technical problem of the Fox News site


Wednesday, 27 November 2013

News: 'How I Met Your Mother' creators tease upcoming moments, talk spinoff


When I read that piece of news, I got paralysed. It was looking straight into Medusa's eyes. I mean, "How I Met Your Dad"? Seriously? SRSLY? 

Putin isn't amused either...
Ok, from all the series I talked about during my sitcom presentation, How I Met Your Mother definitely is my favourite one. If I remember correctly I even did a blog post on it some time ago. There are many reasons why I fell in love with that series. The characters are AWESOME (I'm practically identical to Ted Mosby... oh yeah, Barney's cool as well), the story is insanely addicting (We all want to know who the **** the mother is, don't we? ... Yeah, I'm having a déjà-vu as well) and the humour is great, I still laugh after seeing the same episodes many times.
But nothing on this planet justifies, and when I say NOTHING I mean NOTHING, a completely unnnecessary offshoot NOBODY wants. Well, at least I don't want it and since my gene structure seems to be an almost perfect match to the sitcom's protagonist's, my word is law.
I can understand the producers; they want to make more money, they're sad because soon How I Met Your Mother will be departed, they want to make more money, they still have many ideas for new amazingly funny love stories, they want to make more money...
But in my opinion, you have to know when the fun's over. Everything perishes one day. The essential thing about art is that it's immortal because it leaves a certain impression on the people's mind. Because it touches our hearts and souls. And yes, I'm calling an American sitcom a piece of art... It's... modern art. It can have any possible shape, you know. Anyway, it loses its appeal if you practice grave desecration. Trying to keep alive a patient who has long had their best times and who's prepared to die... Just learn to let go of the things that are over!
The point is, when you created a great series which was already nine seasons long (quite some time for a love story...), then don't go and begin another with the same pattern giving it such an obvious title like "How I Met Your Dad". Oh dear, the jumpiness I felt the moment I heard about the producer's plans... I hope they reject their plans before things get too serious. It would be a shame if they actually released the spinoff and ended up dropping it. That would be an unsatisfying end for a very good series...
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnghhhh...

Well, let's look on the bright side of life. At least I've learnt three new words thanks to that article:

News: "Hunger Games: Catching Fire devours US box office"


Having said that, I should warn you of possible inside jokes during this blog post. Oops, a little late I guess. A little hint: the gag in the hyperlink text is true "black" humour...

Have you read The Hunger Games? No? But you've seen the movie, haven't you? Neither? Ok, seriously, you must a be a robot from the NASA constructed for Mars missions because only someone running around on another planet could have missed that one. I mean, please, even I have seen the film! And I even read the first book. And it's rather difficult to get me to read a book, to be honest...

Okay, so the second installment of the saga of The Hunger Games launched last week in cinemas around the world. Catching Fire is the title of the sequel all the fans have been waiting for anxiously. Wait, why anxiously? Basically because, even though it definitely was a decent piece of cinematic work, the ones who had already read the book (and had consequently become really, like really hysteric about the movie... I'm speaking from experience) were disappointed because of the abundant discrepancies between the first film and the novel.

This girl is on fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiireeeeeeeeeee! This girl is on fiiiiiiireeeeeeeeee!
But this time they spared neither trouble nor expense (the latter being reflected in the more lavish budget in comparison to the predecessor) so Catching Fire would outperform the first movie. And hell they did a good job. According to the source of this news item, Catching Fire has had the 4th best opening in the United States of all time. Only The Avengers, Iron Man 3 and Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows: Part II surpass the $158 millions of Catching Fire during the opening period.
I went to see the film myself last Saturday, more or less voluntarily. I guess I should explain myself. I was actually going to watch another movie but as I arrived in the cinema I realised two crucial facts:
1. A lot of people live there. More than I thought. I've never seen that much people in that cinema before.
2. The consequence of point 1 is that they spontanously decided to occupy another hall for Catching Fire without informing about that on their website. Guess which film was kicked out of the programme. Exactly, the one I was going to watch. So finally I had no other choice but to... well, catch fire.
The problem is, I planned to read the book first this time (something I never accomplished in my lifetime). I have it at home. Virgin. I mean, I haven't read it yet. No time, other interests, etc. *Sigh*... I'll read it this Christmas I suppose.
But I promise, I'm going to read part 3, Mockingjay, before the films come out! Especially because they'll divide the third movie into 2 parts *giggle*.
My humble opinion about the movie? It was great, way better than the first one. And my trustworthy sources told me that Catching Fire is much closer to the book it's based on. If you haven't seen it yet, it's really worth it, give it a try! Catching Fire really skews the former opinion of the fans on the cinematic realization of novels!
And no, as you've already noticed, I'm not really part of the THG fandom... Though I really appreciate the saga. Anyway, it's part of those fandoms basically teenage girls belong to. And I'm saying that without any trace of sexism, it's just my observation. There's that Internet phenomena of teenage girls addicted to several book sagas with great fandoms, for example about Harry Potter, The Hunger Games, The Chronicles of Narnia... It's quite interesting in fact! 

And here's what you all have been waiting for... The 3 magical words:

outperform








Oh, and I forgot to mention something very important. I love Jennifer Lawrence, the actress playing the role of the protagonist, Katniss Everdeen. She really crushes Hollywood's stereotypes. She is no anorexic Barbie puppet, but a well-built nimble-witted young woman with a great sense of humour. If I hadn't known about her personality I'd probably have said she's not my type, but her attitude makes her too sexy to ignore her. So girls, THAT is what we men seek. Or at least many of us.

News: "Higgs boson book scoops Royal Society Winton Prize"


And now, to set the final tick on the predictable Crazy German topics (we've already had animes and games... which one is missing?); today we talk about:


I can almost taste the salty essence of your tears of joy after hearing about this.

Okay, so there's this certain award called the Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books. Basically, they honor the best science-related book written for a non-specialist audience, that is to say, popular science. Or in other words, you and I will understand those books perfectly without having any degree in the subject in question. Assumed you and I can read. But since we're communicating through this... well, written blog post, I guess we can skip that part... can we? Yes, we can.
The book that scooped the award this time is "The Particle at the End of the Universe" by Sean Carroll. Among the five nominated authors, he was the only physicist. And yet, he won. Personally, I'm very glad that they chose a book that talks about particle physics. I'd love to see that topic getting more popular between the commonality. After all, if explained in a tangible way, it can be easily comprehended without getting too much into the details just as any other science (we all read articles about medicine, biology, etc.; why not physics as well?). But what probably makes this specific issue that interesting is that it could give us answers to the huge questions. And we all like huge things. You know what I mean ;) A huge cake will always be better than a small cake. Just some simple maths ;) 

So what is all that stuff about the Higgs boson? I'll give you my own reduced, amateurish and simplified version. No guarantee on the validity of the following statements.
Ok, so you know that, according to quantum mechanics, all the matter and energy in the universe is made of particles. We always only speak of atoms which consist of protons, neutrons and electrons, though there are other kinds of particles. You also know that all the particles have mass, don't you? It's pure logic, isn't it? Isn't it?
Well, it is not. Because not all of the particles have mass. For example, photons, which are the particles of light, don't have mass. But why? Almost all the other particles do actually have mass, like the infamous neutrinos, so why are photons the strange ones? Well, I guess it's because they watch animes and stuff like that... Sorry, inside joke.
And here the theoretical physicists come into play. Sometimes they overdo it and invent some crazy theories which probably couldn't be analized experimentally in hundred years. But sometimes some of them do their job well and they find some kind of reasonable explanation. They predict a future discovery. They postulate a certain physical reality or law. Well, there was that physics nerd answering to the name of Peter Higgs. He claimed that there had to be some kind of physical field, afterwards called the Higgs field in honor of his work, that "gives" the particles their mass. This field is also made up of particles, the Higgs bosons (bosons form a certain class of particles, this is of no major importance now). These particles are omnipresent and so is the field (note that they sometimes refer to the Higgs boson as the "God particle"). 
We can explain the phenomenon of mass thanks to the Higgs field. Some particles, due to their characteristics, interact with the Higgs field, some don't. Thus, some particles have mass and some don't. How do particles gain mass from the Higgs field? Well, since Einstein's famous formula E=mc² we know that energy and mass are the same thing when we refer to the world of particles. When a particle is accelerated, part of its mass transforms into kinetic energy. When we baffle the particle, part of its energy transforms back into mass. 
The upmost limit of speed is the speed of light. Therefore, the upmost limit of energy is the energy of a particle travelling at the speed of light. And that means, if the particle has the maximum of energy, it has the minimum of mass, which is 0. That's why photons, the particles of light, have no mass. Now imagine there's that Higgs field full of Higgs bosons. Most particles will interact with the Higgs bosons as they move around. As they do, the Higgs bosons act like brakes. Brakes that are everywhere. Since they are everywhere, they lower the possible maximum of speed (that is to say, energy) of a particle. So, if the energy can't reach the maximum, there will always be some residue: the particle's mass.
But now think about this. How do you detect something as fundamental in our universe, something as elusive as the Higgs bosons? It's like trying to show a fish what water is. Well, that's the reason why the story behind the science in relation to the Higgs boson is so interesting. It's seems that scientists at the CERN identified the Higgs boson last year. But they still have to confirm their discovery.

The three new words I've learnt are the following.

Now you go and tell me about three physics concepts you've learnt. Come on!

Sunday, 24 November 2013

News: "Model pupil,15, robbed bank with gun as if he was in a real-life video game"

Beware: I'm a 17-year-old "model pupil" who plays video games, among which you can find violent examples like Resident Evil. Additionally, I'm a fan of manga and anime. According to the world view of the rather experienced (mesured exclusively in time) fraction of our society, especially the ones participating in the politic sector, I'm a highly antisocial potential spree killer with pedophilic traits.
Have you put your stereotype glasses on? Are you ready to read this post with a completely straight tunnel vision? Alright, let's begin.


Let's get over this quickly. There was that 15-year-old boy in Liverpool who robbed a bank with a fake gun. His actions were discovered by his mother when she found £2.200 in his room that were surprisingly not part of his pocket money. She informed the police and they brought him to court where he was eventually granted conditional bail
The case is crystal meth clear, we have to blame the video games.
The two statements in this piece of news that could create controversal opinions because they glorify video games are:

The judge made no mention of any specific video games.

Nicolas Robinson, associate professor in politics and video games research at the University of Leeds, said: [...] ‘Kids should be protected from certain content. I believe Grand Theft Auto is a very sophisticated satirical piece of work – and most kids under 18 just won’t get the satire. And if you don’t get the satire, it’s actually much more problematic than if you do.’

If I've discovered something playing Resident Evil, it's not my inner aggression, but my predilection for red oriental dresses.
And now seriously. At least it seems that the judge was smart enough to stay focused on the actual topic of the crime which was the robbery rather than any possible background that isn't related to the case at all.
And I completely agree with the statement of the university professor. Of course there is some content kids should be protected from. The day I am a father I won't make my little children play violent games, show them porn videos nor make them read satirical critics.
Why? Because they don't understand this kind of content. They still need to form a sane opinion about certain realities before they are exposed critical topics. And as a father it's my duty to educate them ensuring that they can learn with an objective point of view about these issues. My children will probably one day play violent games, watch porn videos and read satirical critics. But that's not something bad in itself. It would be bad if they weren't able to reflect with a clear mind about their consumption. 
And that is what fails. Either the school environment is not favourable for their growth or the parents don't their job as they should do. Or they suffer brom being bullied by some yobs. Or something else happens. There are thousand different reasons that could cause a young mind to end up breaking bad. 
The reasoning the politicians use is that, since they imitate video games with their crimes, the video games must be the origins of their actions. But what about films? They feature murders, robbery, sex, rapes, drugs... And many children see movies that are not suited their age. Of course, it's easier to attack something that I, as a 60-year-old bald head wearing important-looking suits, don't know. For example video games. Because I'm not in touch with that medium. Because it's too distant. And thus, it must be bad. The perfect scapegoat.

Memo to myself; potential blog posts:
- Codeword: Itoi
- Codeword: Meckern
- Codeword: RE
- Codeword: Bad
- Codeword: Aftermath

And finally, three nice words/terms I've learnt (the last link doesn't direct you to a dictionary but it's a decent and simple definition):