Friday, 22 February 2013

Correction of the discussion essay

As a matter of fact, we humans always desire to overcome the obstacles the nature left to us. We dream to fly, to have an eternal life or to control the feelings of other people. Many of us would like to gain one of these abilities, but are they really worth experiments on humans and moral?
On the one hand, it is true that the experiments on human life could help us solve a lot of problems. That is, we could discover the cure for some diseases or make possible some of our dreams. Therefore they could bring a lot of advantgages to most of us because we could enjoy the results of the experiments and make use of them.
But, on the other hand, what about the people involved in the experiments? They would have to suffer because of a small possibility to reach a certain objective after an indetermined time. Is it fair to let some people suffer so the others can enjoy? No one wants to die just for the sake of science or at least a very few people. In fact, there are people with severe economical problems who contribute voluntarily to experiments, but is it morally acceptable to possibly damage these people? Moreover, many of our dreams aren't as good as they seem. For instance, an eternal life for humans could have fatal consequences for ourselves, the other species and our whole biosphere.
To sum up, in my view there have to be strict limits set on the experiments on human beings. No experiments should be realised if they imply the possible harming of the subject, that is, reducing intentionally the mental or physical health of a person (no matter the probability). In addition, every experiment which attempts to break a rule of the nature's balance should be categorically forbidden.

No comments:

Post a Comment